Tonight, as I opened my chat log, I noticed yet another message promising financial freedom: “Don’t depend on monthly income. Make MVR 100,000.” Messages like this arrive almost daily. Different wording, same promise. Over time, instead of reacting with irritation or dismissal, I began to wonder about something deeper: what kind of mind creates these messages, and what kind of thinking sustains them?
As someone interested in understanding the human mind, particularly criminal thinking patterns, this moment felt worth reflecting on.
Criminal Thinking Beyond Violence
When we speak of criminal minds, we often imagine violence, coercion, or visible wrongdoing. Yet much of modern criminal behaviour operates quietly, psychologically, and often invisibly. These messages are not acts of physical force; they are acts of influence. They rely on persuasion, misdirection, and an understanding of how people think under pressure. This form of behaviour tells us that criminality today is often cognitive rather than confrontational.
How the Mind Exploits Mental Shortcuts
Psychological theories suggest that the human mind does not always operate rationally. Under stress, fatigue, or emotional strain, people rely on mental shortcuts to make decisions quickly. Messages promising fast money are designed to activate this automatic mode of thinking. They appeal to hope rather than logic, urgency rather than reflection. The language is intentionally simple, repetitive, and emotionally charged. This suggests that the sender understands not only money but human cognition, specifically how easily critical thinking can be bypassed when life feels overwhelming.
Crime as a Calculated Choice
From another perspective, this behaviour reflects calculated decision-making rather than impulsivity. The individual sending these messages appears to weigh effort against reward. Sending hundreds of messages costs little time, money, or risk. Even if only one person responds, the perceived payoff justifies the action. This reveals a mindset where wrongdoing is framed as efficiency rather than harm. The act is stripped of emotional consequence and reduced to a transaction.
Moral Distance and Justification
What often allows such behaviour to continue is moral disengagement. To sustain this pattern, the sender must psychologically distance themselves from responsibility. The harm is minimised or reframed as opportunity, choice, or even cleverness. Responsibility subtly shifts to the recipient: “They chose to respond.” This internal justification enables repetition without guilt. The mind learns to disconnect action from impact.
The Intended Receiver
Equally important is the mind these messages are meant to reach. They are not random. They are aimed at individuals who may feel trapped by routine, strained by financial pressure, or emotionally exhausted. The promise is not only about money, but it is also about relief, control, and escape. The criminal mind recognises vulnerability not as a call for empathy, but as an opening.
Patterns Over Emotions
What stands out most to me is the predictability. When something repeats daily, it tells us that the psychology behind it works often enough. This is not about blaming those who fall for such messages; it is about recognising how unmet needs make the human mind more suggestible. Awareness begins when we stop reacting emotionally and start observing patterns.
This small moment, opening a chat log, became a reminder of how powerful conscious thinking is. Criminal behaviour is often structured, not chaotic. Manipulation is often subtle, not aggressive. And protection begins not with fear, but with awareness. The moment we pause and ask, “What kind of mind created this?”, we reclaim our agency.
Every message we receive is an invitation to think. Some invitations are honest. Others are carefully designed to exploit how the mind works. Choosing consciousness over impulse may seem small, but it is one of the most powerful acts of self-protection we have.
Comments
Post a Comment